Saturday, April 25, 2015

The atrocities of the pro-European regime in the former Ukraine (2015)

Ukrainian neo-nazis from Azov batallion burned alive a Novorossia resistance fighter on a cross (video 18+)
http://love-anarchy.clan.su/videos/kross.mp4

Ukrainian fighters from a nationalist voluntary regiment "Azov" sent a video of an execution of a Novorossia fighter to militia fighters and hackers from "Cyberberkut".

"According to the authors of this video, the footage was filmed near the village of Shirokino, and "all the separatists, traitors of Ukraine and militia fighters will be treated the same", -  "Cyberberkut" quoted the message from "Azov".

The footage shows how several punishers tied their victim to the cross, stuck the cross into the ground, and set fire to the wooden structure.

"This will not add fear neither to us nor the Armed Forces of Novorossia: we have already experienced too much in this life! But after this hardly anyone will capture "Azov" members alive" - responded the hackers to the atrocities of the security forces.

"Azov" is one of the most infamous units of the Ukrainian National Guard, was formed as a battalion, in the fall expanded to a regiment. The unit consists of staunch nationalists - Ukrainian and mercenaries from other countries. The regiment uses the symbols of SS of Nazi Germany on its flag. Atrocities, harassment and war crimes of "Azov" fighters against the civilian population were repeatedly reported. Based in Mariupol.



http://fortruss.blogspot.ru/2015/04/ukrainian-neo-nazis-from-azov-batallion.html


Saturday, April 18, 2015

Crimeans Keep Saying No to Ukraine


A few days ago an interesting study, “The Socio-Political Sentiments in Crimea,” was released by the Ukrainian branch of GfK, the well-known German social research organization, as part of the Free Crimea initiative. Intriguingly, the primary objectives of this project, launched with the support of the governmental Canada Fund for Local Initiatives, were to “debunk aggressive Russian propaganda” and to “reintegrate Crimea into Ukraine.” Thus the researchers can hardly be suspected of being Russian sympathizers. So let’s take a look at the results.
The attitudes of Crimeans were studied in January 2015. This representative sample included 800 respondents living on the peninsula, from all age and social categories. The poll had an error margin of 3.5%.
In answer to the most important question: “Do you endorse Russia’s annexation of Crimea?82% of the respondents answered “yes, definitely,” and another 11% – “yes, for the most part.” Only 2% gave an unambiguously negative response, and another 2% offered a relatively negative assessment. Three percent did not specify their position.
We feel that this study fully validates the results of the referendum on reunification with Russia that was held on March 16, 2014. At that time 83% of Crimeans went to the polling stations and almost 97% expressed support for reunification.
Ukrainians continue to question whether this was a credible outcome, but it is now backed up by the data obtained by the Germans. The 82% of the respondents who expressed their full confidence in the results of the Russian election make up the core of the electorate who turned up at the ballot boxes on March 16, 2014.
These figures are also relevant in terms of another important question. The former chairman of the Mejlis of the Crimean Tatars, Mustafa Dzhemilev, has repeatedly stated that all Tatars on the peninsula are opposed to reunification with Russia. Dzhemilev’s statements have been widely quoted by the media, which present them as entirely authoritative and undisputed.
But let’s think about that – Crimean Tatars make up 12% of the Crimean population, yet only 4% of those polled conveyed disapproval of Crimea’s reunification with Russia. And that 4% very likely includes not only Tatars, but also Ukrainians and citizens of other ethnicities. There’s an inconsistency here. Of course further study is needed on this issue, but the results obtained by GFK cast doubt on whether Mustafa Dzhemilev or the entire Mejlis of the Crimean Tatars is an accurate barometer of the feelings of the Crimean Tatar community.
Those few respondents who disapproved reunification were then asked “Why do you fully or mostly disapprove annexation?Only 20% of them (i.e., less than 1% of the total sample) claimed that they preferred to live in the state of Ukraine. The most common response, offered by 55% of those who opposed reunification, was “Annexations was not fully legitimate, it should be brought into accord with the international law.” Which means that, in theory, they do not object to the idea of living in Russia, but rather question the legitimacy of the transition.

No doubt it would be a good idea to hold such a referendum under the auspices of international legislation and in accordance with Ukrainian law. But would laws ever be passed that would grant Ukrainian regions the right to secede? Back in the totalitarian Soviet Union, Ukraine exercised its right to a referendum without a single shot being fired, while in “democratic Ukraine,” separatists are either burned alive as in Odessa, or are shot along with the elderly and children as is happening in the Donbass.
In answer to a question about their financial circumstances, 21% of Crimeans said that in the last year their position had “improved significantly,” while another 30% claimed it had “somewhat improved.” Only 13% of that population has experienced a setback, to a greater or lesser extent. This suggests that, despite EU sanctions on the peninsula’s economy, and despite Ukraine’s partial blockade on communication from Crimea, the reunification with Russia has provided most Crimeans with material gains. But even among those who have not reaped those sorts of benefits, there are few signs of nostalgia for their old Ukrainian citizenship: although 13% of citizens have seen their financial well-being decline, only 4% disapprove of the reunification with Russia. These figures suggest that economic sanctions are an ineffective means of persuading the residents of the Crimea to view Ukraine more favorably.
The results of the survey indicate that 28% of the residents of the peninsula regularly watch Ukrainian TV, and another 20% regularly consult Ukrainian news websites. This proves that no steps have been taken in Crimea to restrict access to Ukrainian sources of information, such as Ukraine has done in relation to Russian media.
And now the moment of truth: “What is your opinion of what is being written by the Ukrainian media about Crimea?” Who could be a more objective judge on this issue than the residents of the peninsula themselves? Who else but they – who have been fated to experience all the pros and cons of both Ukrainian and Russian citizenship – could better evaluate the accuracy of the information being published? Perhaps no one.
However, only 1% of those surveyed reported that the Ukrainian media “provides entirely truthful information” and 4% said it was “more often truthful than deceitful.” But 45% of respondents see “completely untrue information” on Ukrainian TV, and another 35% claim those broadcasts are “more often deceitful than truthful.” The rest either do not watch Ukrainian news programs or do not pay attention to information in those programs about Crimea.

This is the verdict on the contemporary Ukrainian press, as handed down by an impartial panel of eight hundred jurors.
But if those who shape the media coverage in Ukraine today are so biased in regard to Crimea, how can we expect them to report objectively on other critical problems associated with this country? Can we trust Kiev’s official stance on the tragedy of Malaysia Airlines Flight 17? Or on the causes of the humanitarian crisis in the Donbass? Or on the presence of Russian troops inside Ukraine? Or on the human fatalities in Odessa or the victims of the “Heavenly Hundred”?
GfK’s study demands a clear answer to these questions.
By Konstantin KOSARETSKY (Ukraine)

http://orientalreview.org/2015/02/10/german-sociologists-on-crimeas-choice/


Additional links:
http://www.globalresearch.ca/the-annexation-of-crimea-to-russia-opinion-poll/5430781

Crimeans Keep Saying No to Ukraine

https://consortiumnews.com/2015/03/22/crimeans-keep-saying-no-to-ukraine/

http://www.tbrnews.org/?p=980

Thursday, April 16, 2015

Prominent Ukrainian journalist Oles Buzina shot dead in Kiev

Two famous Ukrainian journalists have been shot dead in Kiev, as announced by local media.
The names of the killed men are Oles Buzina and Sergei Suhobok, OFF News reported.
The former has been shot mere minutes ago in the yard fo his home, as announced by the Deputy Chair of the Right sector party, Anna Demit.
The information has been confirmed by the First Aid Headquarters in Kiev, as well as by the councellor in the Ukrainian Interior Ministry, Anton Gerashenko.
Buzina was a famous journalist, writer and TV presenter, as well as former editor in chief of the Today newspaper, but resigned over internal censure issues.
Meanwhile, Ukrainian media revealed that the owner of Internet-based media ProUA and Obkom Sergei Suhobok has been shot dead at the eve between April 12 and 13.

http://www.novinite.com/articles/167936/Famous+Journalists+Shot+Dead+in+Ukraine%27s+Kiev


Book of Oles Buzina - The Secret History of Ukraine-Rus (in Russian) DOWNLOAD - http://love-anarchy.clan.su/others/Buzina.pdf


Mal zur Erinnerung: Diese völlig durchgeknallten Psychopathen könnten schon bald ‪#‎EU‬-Bürger sein. Merkel und ihr kriminelles Gefolge verhandeln mit diesen Mördern nach wie vor einen möglichen Beitritt zur Europäischen Union. Geht es nach dem Willen Washingtons, dann soll das Land sogar zeitnah in die ‪#‎NATO‬ aufgenommen werden. Aktuell beliefert die US-Regierung, die faschistische Junta in Kiew, mit schweren Waffen im Wert von über 4 Milliarden

http://love-anarchy.clan.su/videos/kross.mp4


Thursday, March 5, 2015

Großbritannien schickt Truppen in die Ukraine und provoziert damit Weltkrieg auf europäischen Boden!

Der britische Premier David Cameron hat bekannt gegeben, dass Großbritannien militärisches Personal für Infanterieausbildung, logistische, medizinische und Aufklärungstätigkeiten in die Ukraine entsenden wird. Diese sollten, so der Premier weiter, „der Ukraine helfen, ihre taktischen Vorteile zu verbessern". Begründung: Taktische Vorteile für Kiew! Bei seiner Rede vor dem britischen Unterhaus sagte Camron wörtlich:   
Im Verlauf der nächsten Monate werden wir britisches Militär in die Ukraine entsenden, mit dem Ziel eine Reihe von Trainingsmaßnahmen im Bereich von taktischer Aufklärung, Logistik und medizinischer Versorgung durchzuführen. Darüber hinaus werden wir auch ein Infanterietrainingsprogramm aufsetzen, um die Durchhaltefähigkeit ihrer Kräfte zu erhöhen.


http://mzw-widerstand.de/blog/MZWTV/mobilmachung_hat_begonnen_grobritannien_schickt_truppen_in_die_ukraine_und_provoziert_damit_weltkrieg_auf_europischen_boden-527373.html



Monday, March 2, 2015

The USA and other organizers of anti-Russian sanctions stand up for Nemtsov's murder

The U.S. policy becomes more aggressive and unpredictable: having suffered shameful defeat in the Ukrainian crisis and full fiasco in organization of the anti-Russian sanctions, it has no other way as to organize “colour revolution” in Russia and unfortunate Boris Nemtsov became the first sacral victim and other Russian leaders of opposition and common citizens are next in turn.
The President of “Centre of Political Forecasting and Analysis” Zbigniew Brzezinski
, the non-governmental analytical structure, analogue and the competitor of known American corporation “RAND Corporation” commented on the event.

Whom Boris Nemtsov’s murder was favourable?
— It becomes obvious the principles of the U.S. founding fathers are completely forgotten in the second decade of the XXI century, our Constitution is the Fig leaf for naked desire of ruling elite to win world supremacy once and for all.
The people of the USA contrary to the Constitution have no power, it actually turned into stupid biomass which is convinced that only the USA know what is democracy and only Americans are capable to provide the respect for human rights and freedom to the rest of the world.
The USA became the accident state for the rest of the world which unleashes the conflicts everywhere where it is possible to provide the own existence.
The USA repeatedly showed what is democracy in its understanding in Vietnam and further in Iraq, Libya, Syria, Yugoslavia and now in Ukraine. It should be noted the capitalism was formed along with the collapse of the USSR in Russia against which the communists unsuccessfully tried to fight in due time and newly appeared Russian capitalists sincerely counted the principles of law and free competition act on the international scene in reality.
However the reality appeared quite another: the western partners not only actively interfered with penetration of the Russian capital on the markets, but also repeatedly broke rules of play, for example, as it occurred during the Cyprian crisis of 2012−2013 and by that compelled the Russian capital to look for protection at the state.
Thus, direct collision of interests of the USA and Russia became inevitable.
Without having opportunities to organize dissolution of Russia from within, the USA organized the Ukrainian crisis, not without reason counting it will directly be got involved in operations sooner or later and thereby will promote formation of the united western coalition resisting to the Russian attempts to protect the quite legitimate interests. However Putin was more skilful and this plan wasn’t implemented.
Then in July, 2014 the provocative accident of “Boeing-737” was organized, however it was made so clumsy that there were numerous reasonable doubts in participation of Russia in this tragic event not only in the countries allies of the USA, but inside. But it was a reason for introduction of the anti-Russian sanctions.
Certainly, its main goal was activation of antigovernment moods among the Russian people and, in particular, the Russian elite.
At the same time the USA promoted operations activation in the Southeast of Ukraine in every possible way, having begun arms supply, including, from the European countries and Canada and also organizing military instructors and mercenaries sending there.
By February, 2015 the U.S. leadership understood the Ukrainian army is incapable to win even having the mercenaries and western arms. And then there was a threat of defeat in the Ukrainian crisis.
Among other things, such defeat deprives the USA not only of possibilities of further claims for world leadership, but also conducts to deterioration of an economic situation as the indicators of the U.S. public debt exceed all conceivable and inconceivable critical indicators for a long time.
Under such conditions no holds barred and only therefore the murder of the Russian oppositionist Boris Nemtsov was organized. By the way, this murder reminds the death of the Kiev journalist Gongadze which was the cause for unleashing of the anti-presidential company concerning the Ukrainian president Leonid Kuchma in 2000 year.

Who stands up for Nemtsov’s murder? What further succession of events will be?
— My friends from the U.S. National Security Agency are sincerely sure Nemtsov’s death will be the cause for mass protests on March 1 in the Russian capital. According to them, the experts who were carrying out a task of “Heaven’s Hundred” execution on the Maidan participated in Nemtsov’s murder, and the organizers were the security service specialists of Ukraine which is a source of provocations commission for causes creation in the subsequent charges of Russia.
In spite of the fact the Russian opposition already fishily quickly refused to carry out the “Spring” march and intends to carry out mourning procession in the centre of Moscow, it would be desirable to tell the following: some more armed provocations are planned for March 1 in order to provoke collisions of the police power with the Russian authorities according to the experience of the Ukrainian Maidan. For this purpose tens of people arrived from the territory of Ukraine to Moscow.
Certainly, it is necessary to expect the beginning of the next mass hysteria in mass media and social networks about a stereotype of the corresponding atmosphere organization of an initial stage of “colour revolutions” which became already habitual. The appeals to Muscovites “not to leave the cars within the Garden Ring on Sunday” spread in social networks at once after Boris Nemtsov’s murder that only confirms the intention of the USA to aggravate an internal political situation in Russia. Certainly, there were charges to Putin. Of course, the requirements of the USA to other western countries to toughen sanctions concerning Russia immediately are inevitable.
Thus, obvious direct danger is threatened to life of the Russian citizens and leaders of opposition, in particular. If I were Putin I would put the state security to them. As a bitter experience of unfortunate Boris Nemtsov shows, it is impossible to trust our American politicians, especially when they are in position of the mustang who is tired out on the razor-edge.

Author: Argyl Terner, Canada
Publication date : 28 February 2015 14:47


http://www.worldandwe.com/en/page/the_usa_and_other_organizers_of_antirussian_sanctions_stand_up_for_nemtsovs_murder.html


Former CIA Analyst Steven D. Kelley - Why Putin Had Nothing To Do With The Murder Of Boris Nemtsov




Sunday, February 22, 2015

NATO and Kiev Lied Claiming “Russian Invasion of Ukraine”

In-depth Report:
 
How many previous times did Big Lies proliferate about hoards of Russians coming? Claimed by US officials. Other Western ones. 
Former NATO Secretary-General Anders Fogh Rasmussen. Current NATO head Jens Stoltenberg.
The latest on January 22 from NATO commander US General Philip Breedlove. Earlier he suggested the same thing. More on what he said below.
Last August, State Department spokeswoman Jen Psaki claimed a nonexistent “Russian-directed counteroffensive is likely underway in Donetsk and Luhansk.”
“(W)e’re also concerned by the Russian Government’s unwillingness to tell the truth even as its soldiers are found 30 miles inside Ukraine,” she said.
“Russia is sending its young men into Ukraine but…are not telling them where they’re going or telling their parents what they’re doing.”
Asked why she said “likely” instead of saying a Russian invasion is underway, Psaki said she “decided to say likely.”
“But why,” she was asked? “(L)ikely implies…some uncertainty because there is a possibility that it’s not.”
Psaki ducked the question. Merely cited “a range of (unsubstantiated) reports.”
“Well, is it an invasion,” she was asked? “(A)re we seeing, like, brigades or divisions crossing the borders into Ukraine?”
“I don’t have any other details to read out for you at this point in time,” she said.
No Russian invasion occurred. Nor was one planned. Psaki lied suggesting otherwise.
On Thursday, she was asked about illegitimate oligarch Ukrainian president Petro Poroshenko claiming 9,000 Russian troops, tanks and heavy equipment in Ukraine.
On the one hand, she claimed no “confirmation of the figures.” On the other, she lied accusing self-defense forces of “increase(d) violence.”
“(I)ncluding renewed attacks…on the Donetsk airport (and) seizures of more territory.”
“We’ve also seen reports that two tactical battalions – Russian tactical (ones) – Russia has moved two tactical battalions into Ukraine.”
Admitting no “independent (corroborating) confirmation” exists.
At the same time “confirming…Russia(n) tanks, armored vehicles, trucks, artillery pieces, and other military equipment…deploy(ed) (to) sites near the Russia-Ukraine border…”
“(S)taging points before transporting military equipment to pro-Russian separatists,” she claimed.
On the one hand, saying “(t)hat is something we’re seeing.” On the other, admitting no confirmation.
RT International reported its Washington correspondent Gayane Chichakyan’s inability to get Psaki to give “straight response(s)” to her questions.
Ignoring Kiev high crimes against peace. Irresponsibly blaming them on Russia. Chichakyan saying “the US always has something to say about Russia, but never about what the Ukrainian government is doing.”
Throughout months of US planned, directed and instigated conflict in Ukraine, Washington consistently blames Russia for its own high crimes.
“(A)voiding questions,” said Chichakyan. Refusing to acknowledge Kiev using heavy artillery in Donbas. Including against residential neighborhoods.
Calling naked Kiev aggression its “absolute right to defend itself.” When pressed to answer Chickakyan’s questions, Psaki responded saying “I think I’ll leave it at what I said.”
Including the Big Lie about Russia “illegally interven(ing) in Ukraine.” Despite no evidence whatever suggesting it. Plenty proving otherwise.
Previous articles explained how Vladimir Putin, Sergey Lavrov and other Russian officials continue going all out for peaceful conflict resolution.
Impossible with Washington arming, funding and directing its puppet Kiev government to wage war on Donbas without mercy.
Including against defenseless civilians. Murdering them in cold blood.
Kiev state-sponsored murder in Donetsk the latest example. Attacking a Leninsky district bus stop.
With multiple minivan-launched mortar strikes. Killing around a dozen civilians. Mostly women. Injuring many others.
Brazen state terrorism. Kiev wrongfully blaming the incident on Donbas freedom fighters.
Psaki suggesting it by claiming “an increase in separatist violence…”
Ukraine is a hotbed of fascist extremism. Illegitimate US-installed putschists run things.
Democracy is pure fantasy. Human and civil rights nonexistent.
Premeditated aggression without mercy continues against Donbas freedom fighters refusing to accept fascist rule.
Last Friday, State Department spokesman Jeff Rathke claimed otherwise. Repeating one Big Lie after another.
Saying Ukraine “has come an enormous distance (over the past year) to meet its people’s aspirations.”
Its “current government remains committed to advancing important reforms, despite ongoing violence in eastern Ukraine.”
Ugnoring US-sponsored and directed aggression on Donbass. Claimed illegitimate farcical presidential and parliamentary elections were “free and fair.”
Said Kiev’s regime controlled judiciary is independent. Suggested anti-corruption efforts are working.
Ukraine arguably is Europe’s most corrupt country. Worse than ever now under fascist rule.
“(W)e congratulate the people of Ukraine on how far they have come in such a short time,” said Rathke.
“And we continue to stand with them as they press forward on critical reforms.”
Conditions in Ukraine are polar opposite Rathke’s description. State terror is official policy. Fascist regimes operate this way.
Don’t expect Washington to explain. Or other Western governments. Or supportive MSM scoundrels. Regurgitating official Big Lies like gospel.
The New York Times describing Kiev’s mortar attack on a civilian Donetsk bus as an “early morning explosion show(ing) the bus…with its tires flattened, its sides punched in, filled with shards of concrete and stone and all of its windows either shattered or pocked with holes.”
Citing “conflicting reports” about what happened. Despite clear evidence of Kiev culpability.
Sergey Lavrov correctly accused its “party of war” of committing “a crime against humanity, a rude provocation aimed at undermining the efforts on a peace settlement.”
The Times quoted Poroshenko turning truth on its head. Saying “(i)f the enemy does not want to abide by the cease-fire, if the enemy doesn’t want to stop the suffering of innocent people in Ukrainian villages and towns, we will give it to them in the teeth.”
General Breedlove earlier lied about Russian intervention in Ukraine. On January 22, Pentagon controlled Stars and Stripes headlined “Threat of new Russian incursion as violence flares in Ukraine.”
Citing Breedlove saying Russian forces are building up their presence on Ukraine’s border.
“What we do see is that the Russian-backed forces have renewed capability now to bring pressure on the Ukrainian forces, and have in several places moved the line of contact to the west. And this is concerning,” said Breedlove.
He claimed a repeat of two previous nonexistent Russian incursions, adding:
“We are beginning to see the signatures of air defense systems and electronic warfare systems that have accompanied past Russian troop movements into Ukraine, but we are unable at this moment to confirm any specific number of additional Russian troops inside eastern Ukraine.”
US Army European commander Lt. General Ben Hodges lied claiming “irrefutable” evidence showing Donbas self-defense forces getting “direct support from Russia.”
No evidence whatever proves it. None exists. Including irresponsible NATO/Poroshenko claims about Russia invading Ukraine.
What satellite images would clearly show if true. None exist.
Igor Kolomoisky is an Israeli/Ukrainian billionaire-appointed Dnipropetrovsk Oblast governor.
Nicknamed Benya. Living in Switzerland. Infamous for using paramilitaries to enforce hostile takeovers of companies he covets.
Forbes magazine earlier said he sent “hired rowdies armed with baseball bats, iron bars, gas and rubber bullet pistols and chainsaws” to forcibly take over a Kremenchuk steel plant in 2006.
He uses “a mix of phony court orders (often involving corrupt judges and/or registrars) and strong-arm tactics” to replace board directors of companies he invests in.
Criticized by a judge in a London court case for seeking “to take control of a company at gunpoint in Ukraine.”
Putin once called him “a unique crook.” Russia wants him put on Interpol’s wanted list.
On July 2, 2014, a Russian district court authorized his arrest in absentia. For “organizing the killing of civilians.”
On January 22, Fort Russ headlined “Kolomoisky is preparing a massive private army for a coup in Kiev.”
“(B)ehind the scenes of Ukrainian theater, namely in Dnepropetrovsk, a powerful military formation is in the final stages of preparation.”
“It consists of foreign military battalions, and has a strong skeleton from NATO specialists.”
“Dnepropetrovsk needed time to prepare, and a good smoke screen.”
“We observe the highest activity at all the areas of military-political field of Ukraine, all except for Dnepropetrovsk.”
“It is hot in Donbass, Kiev, Kharkov, Odessa. Even Western Ukraine is heating up. Only Dnepropetrovsk is quiet.”
“(A)s soon as Dnepropetrovsk ripens it will capture the power in Verkhovnaya Rada (Ukraine’s parliament) along with the right to institute a martial law.”
Fort Russ reports a “new phase of Ukrainian crisis” unfolding…(A) destruction of Ukraine” emanating from Dnepropetrovsk.
“Everything is almost ready there.” Are Washington’s dirty hands involved?
Does it want Kolomoisky replacing Pororshenko? For sure it’s displeased with Donbas freedom fighters consistently routing Kiev’s military.
A guerrilla force defeating its army. Do US officials think Kolomoisky’s reputation for ruthlessness can change things?
Forthcoming articles will discuss future events as they unfold. The battle for Ukraine’s soul very much continues.
A Final Comment
On Wednesday, US Army European commander Lt. General Ben Hodges confirmed plans to deploy US combat troops to Ukraine.
For a “training operation,” he said. To strengthen the “rule of law,” he claimed. Code language for aiding Kiev in its aggression on Donbas.
Hodges called what’s planned a “first step in further training.” Likely mission creep involving US military forces in Kiev’s dirty war.
It remains to be seen whether Washington intends so-called advisors operating along Donbas’ front line.
Directly or indirectly participating in combat. A major provocation if happens. Perhaps triggering an undetermined Russian response.
Stephen Lendman lives in Chicago. He can be reached at lendmanstephen@sbcglobal.net. His new book as editor and contributor is titled “Flashpoint in Ukraine: US Drive for Hegemony Risks WW III.” http://www.claritypress.com/LendmanIII.html Visit his blog site at sjlendman.blogspot.com. Listen to cutting-edge discussions with distinguished guests on the Progressive Radio News Hour on the Progressive Radio Network. It airs three times weekly: live on Sundays at 1PM Central time plus two prerecorded archived programs. 

http://www.globalresearch.ca/nato-commander-lied-claiming-possible-russian-invasion-of-ukraine-coming/5426437
http://sjlendman.blogspot.ru/2015/01/nato-commander-lied-claiming-possible.html
http://thechronicleherald.ca/world/1270124-rebels-celebrate-taking-town-in-ukraine
http://youtu.be/uBGL_EoZ7hE


Thursday, February 19, 2015

Ukrainian Soldiers’ Retreat From Eastern Town Raises Doubt for Truce

ARTEMIVSK, Ukraine — Ukrainian soldiers were forced to fight their way out of the embattled town of Debaltseve in the early hours of Wednesday, casting further doubt on the credibility of a days-old cease-fire and eroding the promise of ending a war in Europe that has killed more than 5,000 people.
It was unclear Wednesday how many of the thousands of Ukrainian soldiers trapped in the eastern Ukrainian town had survived the hellish retreat under enemy fire and avoided capture. President Petro O. Poroshenko put the figure at 80 percent, but since the Ukrainian military has never commented on its troop strength, the final accounting may never be known.
By midday on Wednesday, as limping and exhausted soldiers began showing up in Ukraine-held territory, it became clear that the Ukrainian forces had suffered major losses, both in equipment and human life.
“Many trucks left, and only a few arrived,” said one soldier, who offered only his rank, sergeant, and first name, Volodomyr, as he knelt on the sidewalk smoking. “A third of us made it, at most.”

The political fallout was as uncertain as the military situation. Mr. Poroshenko sought to cast the retreat in a positive light, saying in a televised statement that he had ordered the troops out of Debaltseve, a strategic transportation hub where intense fighting raged in recent days despite a cease-fire agreement signed last week in Minsk, Belarus.
Yet, his decision to fight for several days before retreating, and his earlier refusal to hand over the town during the cease-fire talks even when a Ukrainian defeat seemed inevitable, could prove contentious in Ukraine as the scale of the potential slaughter comes into focus.
“It was clear they couldn’t get a deal on Debaltseve,” Samuel Charap, senior fellow for Russia and Eurasia at the International Institute for Strategic Studies, said of the Minsk talks. “The question then becomes: What the hell was Poroshenko thinking?”
The brazen disregard for the cease-fire on the part of the Russian-backed separatists also called into question the future of the Minsk agreement and the standing of two of its primary sponsors, Chancellor Angela Merkel of Germany and President François Hollande of France, who once again proved powerless to stop President Vladimir V. Putin of Russia from achieving his objectives in defiance of Europe’s wishes.
Jen Psaki, the State Department spokeswoman, said that Secretary of State John Kerry had on Wednesday urged Sergey V. Lavrov, the Russian foreign minister, “to stop Russian and separatist attacks on Ukrainian positions in Debaltseve and other violations of the cease-fire.”
In Brussels on Wednesday, the European Union’s foreign policy chief, Federica Mogherini, said the group “stands ready to take appropriate action in case the fighting and other negative developments in violation of the Minsk agreements continue.”

Mr. Putin, speaking on Tuesday in Hungary about the fate of Ukraine in Debaltseve, said that it was always tough to lose. “But life is life,” he said. “It just goes on. No need to dwell on it.”
Given Russian backing for the rebels in Debaltseve, including troops and advanced weaponry, “the question was when, not if, it fell,” said Mark Galeotti, a professor of global affairs at New York University and an expert in Russian security matters. “It is just too strategic a communications hub for Donetsk and Luhansk, and a weakness in the rebel defensive line, for Moscow or the rebel leaderships to pass up.”
If there was a shred of good news for Mr. Poroshenko, it was that by avoiding capture, the soldiers who made it out also avoided handing the rebels a powerful bargaining chip. But from the harrowing accounts of survivors of the retreat, that success was purchased at a terrible price.
A rebel assault that began within hours of the signing of the Minsk accord intensified on Tuesday with attacks by tanks and well-equipped infantry that quickly left most of the town under separatist control.
The order to retreat was kept secret until the last minute, and soldiers were told to prepare in 10 minutes and pile into the beds of troop transport trucks, according to Albert Sardaryen, 22, a medic who made the journey.
Unbeknown to them, preparations had been underway for days, as the military leadership searched for a means of escape other than the main road out of town, which was mined and controlled by the rebels. After sending ambulances over farmers’ fields and down back roads without attracting notice, they had their route.

The trucks lined up on the edge of town around 1 a.m., Mr. Sardaryen said, while tanks and tracked vehicles formed lines on either side of the convoy to try to shield the soldiers. The column of trucks, carrying more than 2,000 men, Ukrainian officials later said, kept their headlights off to make them harder to spot.
Despite the precautions, the column came under attack almost immediately, Mr. Sardaryen said, and trucks started breaking down and colliding in the dark. By dawn, the column was strung out on the plain and taking fire from all sides.
“They were shooting with tanks, rocket-propelled grenades and sniper rifles,” and firing at the disintegrating column with rockets, he said. Dead and wounded soldiers were left on the snowy fields because there were too many of them to carry once the trucks were hit.
“We stabilized them, applied tourniquets, gave them painkillers and tried to put them in a place with better cover,” Mr. Sardaryen said of the wounded.
Later, a Ukrainian unit from outside the encirclement drove in to try to retrieve the wounded, he said.
Mr. Sardaryen said he ran for the final four miles or so. Many of the soldiers who made it out also did so on foot, though some trucks made it all the way through, he said.

Oleksandr I. Bogunov, an army private, said the order had come to carry only what would be useful for the fight on the way out, and to leave all other ammunition and weaponry behind.
It remained unclear how many troops were stationed in the town. Mr. Poroshenko’s assertion that 80 percent had escaped in a column of a little over 2,000 soldiers would seem to indicate total troop strength of less than 3,000.
What did seem certain was that Mr. Poroshenko would face tough questioning in the days ahead. Though the cease-fire agreement was reached on Thursday, it did not formally take effect until Sunday.
The leaders provided no real explanation of the decision to delay its implementation for about 60 hours.
Mr. Poroshenko has said that he was willing to accept an immediate halt in the fighting, and that the delay was at Russia’s insistence. That seemed to be a reflection of the advantageous position of separatist fighters on the ground in the battle for Debaltseve.
In any event, the delay provided a window for fierce and bloody combat, and when the cease-fire did take effect, it produced only a brief lull in the fighting.

Mr. Poroshenko spoke by telephone on Wednesday with Ms. Merkel and Vice President Joseph R. Biden Jr. about the continued fighting and the setback for the Ukrainian forces.
Ukraine had asked its Western partners to apply diplomatic pressure to encourage the pro-Russian separatists to observe the cease-fire in Debaltseve, and to allow access for monitors from the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe.
Talks on the issue among the organization, Russia and Ukraine ended without results around 9 p.m. Tuesday, and the order for the retreat came four hours later.
Mr. Poroshenko urged the United Nations Security Council to prevent further breaches by Russia and the separatists.
In a statement, the Ukrainian presidential administration said that Mr. Poroshenko and Ms. Merkel condemned the cease-fire violations in Debaltseve.
While most analysts and European leaders urged patience to give the truce a chance to take hold after Debaltseve, the hard truth was that Ukraine and the rest of Europe were once again at the mercy of Mr. Putin and his proxies in eastern Ukraine.
“The real question is whether now that they have Debaltseve, the rebels and Russia are willing to sit back and let the conflict freeze, or whether they continue their town-by-town push while still proclaiming their support for the cease-fire,” Professor Galeotti said.
Referring to two other contested areas of eastern Ukraine, he said, “They could head for Avdiivka, or redouble their efforts on Mariupol, but I suspect Moscow will want now to settle back, at least for a while, and let Western attention wander.”
Andrew E. Kramer reported from Artemivsk, and David M. Herszenhorn from Moscow. Neil MacFarquhar contributed reporting from Moscow, and Michael R. Gordon from Washington.

A version of this article appears in print on February 19, 2015, on page A1 of the New York edition with the headline: Bloody Retreat Adds to Doubt for Ukraine Truce.

 http://www.nytimes.com/2015/02/19/world/europe/ukraine-conflict-debaltseve.html