Evgeny Prigozhin: "The oligarchs needed the war in Ukraine"

https://youtu.be/WsrxLepsQCc
https://ok.ru/video/5617060874923

Russian Soldiers Evacuate Children from Dangerous Areas of Mariupol

 

video:

http://armakhno.narod.ru/muzon/Russian.mp4

Butchа. Genocide or the great lie?

 

 

VIDEO:
 

 https://love-anarchy.clan.su/videos/butcha.mp4

 

Guerre en Ukraine: Bataille pour le Donbass

 

VIDEO:

http://armakhno.narod.ru/doks/Guerre.mp4

 

 

 

The Truth about the WAR in #Ukraine - Part V - Battle for Debaltsevo

 Part I https://youtu.be/wMKFYrqucmU Part II https://youtu.be/aqtXc0N99Go Part III https://youtu.be/B_SeRVQ-VUw Part IV https://youtu.be/WbkfQFC8Yq4

 

 

Gen GD Bakshi Decodes Russia's Motives Behind Attack On Zaporizhzhia's Nuclear Plant

 

SEE VIDEO: http://armakhno.narod.ru/muzon/Bakshi.mp4

 Nuclear War: Gen GD Bakshi Unravels Russia's Motives Behind Attack On Chernobyl's Nuclear Plant Subscribe to Republic TV & press THE BELL ICON to be updated with the latest news ► http://bit.ly/RepublicWorld Official Website - https://www.republicworld.com/ Republic TV is India's no.1 English news channel since its launch. It is your one-stop destination for all the live news updates from India and around the world. Republic TV makes news accessible for you at your convenience, at all times and across devices. At Republic we keep you updated with up-to-the-minute news on politics, sports, entertainment, lifestyle, gadgets and much more. We believe in Breaking the story and Breaking the Silence. But most importantly, for us ‘You Are Republic, We Are Your Voice.’ Also, Watch ► Republic TV Live News Updates ►http://bit.ly/RepublicTVLiveNews The Debate With Arnab Goswami ► http://bit.ly/TheDebateWithArnabGoswami Patriot With Major Gaurav Arya ► http://bit.ly/PatriotFullEpisodes Exclusive Sunday Debate With Arnab Goswami ► http://bit.ly/SundayDebate Checkmate With Major Gaurav Arya (Retd.) ► https://bit.ly/3EtPj0s The Grand Strategy With Maj Gen G.D Bakshi (Retd) ► https://bit.ly/3EPZ6xF R.Explained ► https://bit.ly/3sOLT5K R.Uninterrupted ► https://bit.ly/34isZdh You can stay connected with Republic TV on - Facebook - https://www.facebook.com/RepublicWorld/ Follow us on Twitter - https://twitter.com/republic Official Website - https://www.republicworld.com/

 

 

Maidan Massacre Ukraine documentary

English version of documentary investigation into the shootings which occurred February 20, 2014 in Kiev's Independence Square, also known as "Maidan". Directed by John Beck-Hofmann.
http://acabpolicestate.weebly.com/fascism-in-europe-ukraine.html

How was occupied France governed during World War II?

After French forces surrendered to German forces, they set up a new demi-Fascist government under one of the more reactionary French generals, known today as Vichy France.

Vichy France had full authority in the unoccupied southern half of France, and theoretical authority in the rest, and was officially a non-belligerant. Only Alsace-Lorraine was officially handed over to the Axis.
 However, the German military effectively had the ultimate authority in the north, and its wishes were generally acceeded to in the south as well. This meant the Vichy goverment merilly rounded up the usual suspects: Jews, Communists, Gypsies, homosexuals, etc. for the German camps. The government was generally viewed as German collaborators, and at the end of the war it appears that most Vichy officials were put on trial as such. The Chief of State of Vichy France, Philippe Pétain, was convicted of treason in July 1945.

The Germans did not "set up" L'État Francais and it was not generally viewed as German collaborators until it became convenient to do so after 1944. In reality it was a popular, more or less legal régime (in terms of its establishment, I mean, not its actions) and acted in accordance with a plausible interpretation of French national interest. Also, merely being an "official" was by no means an offence of indignité nationale -- somebody had to make the trains run on time, right? Specific positive acts of voluntary collaboration were punished, as was membership in the fascist parties.

The Vichy French Gendarmerie was set at 60,000 men by the armistice agreement and following orders by the occupying Germans. Local police retained their normal duties although they were subject to German orders. They were not allowed to retain heavy military weaponry or motorized transport. They were also compelled to work with German occupiers. If the Germans demanded someone be arrested, they would arrest them or take other actions (an example of this was seen in the film Casablanca). They were also tasked with registering and rounding up "undesirable" persons such as Jews, Gypsies and homosexuals.
Politically northern and Atlantic coastal France was under the control of the Germans. Some local government activities continued in these areas but these were under tight German control. Local officials who didn't cooperate fully were typically removed from office and detained, sometimes even executed. Southern France, while not under total control, still had to tow the line with the German occupation. While there were some "elections" these were essentially rubber stamping people who had already been selected by others in power.

With some adjustments, occupied and unoccupied France was based on the limits of German penetration during the war itself. A stretch of the Atlantic coast was handed over to Germany, even though not occupied, while some German-occupied areas along the Loire River were handed back to the "rump" French state in compensation. Germany offered to adjust the border further in favor of the French state if it chose to locate its seat of government in Orleans (instead of Vichy). Basically, France was divided north and south under German and French occupation, as shown in the maps posted by others.
Northern France was directly governed under a German military occupation regime based in Paris,with the coastal areas under a separate authority. Southern France was nominally independent, but generally acceded to German wishes regarding the rounding up of "undesirables," and other matters, and therefore was seen as a "collaborationist" regime. It had its own police force (which was often used to do the Germans' bidding), and retained its navy (in Toulon and elsewhere), and a small "army."
This nominal "independence" basically ended when the Allies invaded North Africa, and the Germans occupied Vichy France as well, erasing the former boundaries. The French fleet in Toulon was scuttled by its crews, rather than handed over to the Germans in this second occupation.

https://history.stackexchange.com/questions/2176/how-was-occupied-france-governed-during-world-war-ii

Krym właściwie malowane, zaczynają wchodzić!

Francuska telewizja TF1 zaprezentowała mapę Europy, która miała obrazować sytuację na Ukrainie. Nie było by w tym nic dziwnego, gdyby nie fakt, że Polska na zaprezentowanej mapie nie należy do Unii Europejskiej.
Można odnieść wrażenie, że przez pomyłkę ktoś zobrazował rzeczywistą mapę sojuszu w razie konfliktu z Rosją. Jednak materiał dotyczył wojny na Ukrainie. Sytuacja jest o tyle dziwna, że TF1 to nie niszowy kanał, tylko najstarsza telewizja w Europie! Takie gafy, jak u Komorowskiego nie powinny mieć miejsca.
 TF1 – prywatna, francuska stacja telewizyjna, której właścicielem jest spółka TF1 Group, której głównym udziałowcem jest firma Bouygues. Jest francuskim odpowiednikiem TVP1. Jest najstarszą antena telewizyjną w Europie i jedną z dwóch obecnie nadawanych anten telewizyjnych na tym kontynencie (obok BBC One) które regularnie rozpoczęły nadawanie przed II wojną światową. TF1 posiada ok. 35% udziału w rynku i jest najpopularniejszą stacją telewizyjną we Francji.

Ukraine War UNCUT: UNDER FIRE in the trenches of Donbass (Eng Subs)

RAW & UNEDITED: Today Ukrainen separatists (terrorists) opened fire on LPR positions with artillery, sniper fire, and small arms breaking Minsk agreements. We were in the LPR trenches when intense battle erupted, Here is unedited video of the point when the LPR position we were in was complete bombarded with artillery.

Why Ukraine Doesn't Get a Say on NATO

It may be called the "Ukraine crisis," but it's really all about NATO.

James Carden

February 20, 2015

As we approach February 21, the first anniversary of the start of the Ukraine crisis, a question that still seems to vex many observers is: what, exactly, does Mr. Putin want?
Answers vary and usually depend on the ideological predisposition of the respondent. Last week, former U.S. Ambassador to Russia Michael McFaul told PBS’s Gwen Ifill, “I still think Putin gains very concretely to his ultimate objective, which is to weaken and ultimately destroy the government in Kiev. That’s what he really wants to do.”
Neoconservatives and liberal interventionists (by now, surely, a distinction without a difference) also generally believe that Mr. Putin wants to at the very least dominate (economically, culturally, militarily) Ukraine—if not resurrect the Soviet Union—and then move on to reclaim the Baltic states for Russia. After that, with the help of the Kremlin’s vast propaganda apparatus and its nefarious far-right clients in Europe, he will begin to tighten his grip over Hungary, Bulgaria, Greece, Serbia and, should the Le Pen and Farage insurgencies continue to gain momentum, France and the UK.
If this is what Mr. Putin wants—a kind of malign hegemony over large swathes of Eastern, Central and Western Europe—then the West would be well-advised to fight Putin in Ukraine, so it won't have to confront him down the road in, say, Riga or Manchester. The argument is eerily similar to the one (or one of the ones) trotted out by the second Bush administration in the lead-up to Iraq: fight 'em over there, so we don't have to fight ‘em over here. It also is an echo of the ‘60s-era domino theory which led to (among other niceties) our decade-long engagement in Vietnam. An intuitively and viscerally appealing idea, it is also completely and utterly discredited. Yet, it persists. Last week, the Economist’s lede article included this old chestnut:

Only the willfully blind would think his revanchism has been sated. Sooner or later it may encompass the Baltic states—members of both the European Union and NATO, and home to Russian minorities of the kind he pledges to “protect.”

What, then, is Mr. Putin’s real endgame? A nonaligned Ukraine and a measure of autonomy for the breakaway republics; though, I see no reason for the West to consent to the latter if it, as it should, agrees to the former.
Don’t the Ukrainians have a voice as to whom they wish to align with? The answer is no. They have forfeited their agency in this matter.
Let’s review; for twenty-five years, Ukraine has proved incapable of governing itself. Sitting astride Europe as a transit point for Russian natural gas, it has allocated its rents as unwisely as possible. The Orange Revolution brought forth a government every bit as corrupt as its predecessors. In 2010, the Ukrainian people voted for a pro-Russian easterner, Viktor Yanukovych. Four years later (and one year ahead of a scheduled presidential election), he was overthrown. (Any doubters as to which side started the shooting on the Maidan would be well-advised to read the BBC’s recent report on the matter.) The current government has, according to organizations that could hardly be described as Kremlin friendly (Human Rights Watch, Amnesty International, the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe), committed war crimes in its attempt to defeat the Russian-backed separatists in the Donbas.
Further, the critics have it backwards: NATO’s principal consideration should not be whether NATO will make Ukraine more secure, but whether Ukraine will make NATO more secure. The answer is self-evident. It is the alliance that has the first and last word on who is allowed to join. So, no, despite the endless protestations from the State Department, Ukraine doesn't get a voice as to whether it gets to join NATO.
But the critics will cry: this is an echo of 18-19th century great-power politics! Yes, I suppose it is. And it is far preferable to the 21st-century alternative of naively stirring up revolutions the world over without any heed to the consequences, which, let us not forget, lead to the deaths of thousands of innocent people.
James Carden is a contributing editor for The National Interest.

http://nationalinterest.org/feature/why-ukraine-doesnt-get-say-nato-12287

Der Flug MN17 – die malaysische Boeing – von einer Rakete des Fliegerabwehr-Raketenkomplexes S-125 „Petschora“ (SA-3)

Der Flug MN17 – die malaysische Boeing – von einer Rakete des Fliegerabwehr-Raketenkomplexes S-125 „Petschora“ (nach der Nato-Klassifizierung – SA-3) abgeschossen worden sein könnte. Zumindest hatten zwei Nato-Aufklärungsflugzeuge, die im Luftraum Polens und Rumäniens das Geschehen in der Ukraine beobachtet haben, sein In-Funktion-treten im Abschussgebiet fixiert. Das Dokument, das vom Staatssekretär des Auswärtigen Amtes Markus Ederer unterzeichnet wurde, enthalte zwar keinerlei Schlussfolgerungen, doch sie würden auf der Hand liegen, bemerkt der Direktor des Zentrums für strategische Konjunktur Iwan Konowalow: „Der Bericht, den die Niederländer im Ergebnis der Untersuchung erstellten, offenbarte nichts. Es ist klar, dass die Boeing abgeschossen wurde. Aber alle erwarten die Antwort auf die Frage, wessen Rakete es gewesen sei. Die deutsche Version fügte dem allgemeinen Bild noch ein weiteres hinzu – dass es die ukrainische Seite gewesen sei. Der S-125-Komplex - das ist eine alte Anlage, in der russischen Armee gibt es sie längst nicht mehr, und schon gar nicht gehört sie zur Bewaffnung der Volkswehr des Donbass.

https://de.sputniknews.com/meinungen/20140919269586299-Russland-wird-Abbremsung-der-Untersuchung-vom-Boeing-Absturz/
http://dip21.bundestag.de/dip21/btd/18/025/1802521.pdf
http://love-anarchy.clan.su/images/1802521.pdf

The history of Ukraine and Ukrainians (artificial roots of the "nation")

Austrian Poles have not invented themselves Ukrainians, but only took up the achievements of his fellow Russian. The invention of the Ukrainians belong to the Polish writer Jan Potocki, who in his book "Historical and geographical fragments of the Scythians, Sarmatians and Slavs", published in Paris in French in 1795, formulated the concept that the Ukrainians who inhabited the Lesser Borderland are people, separate from the Russian and having a completely independent origin. Partly Potocki hypothesis was based on the then popular in Poland Sarmatian theory that Poles were the direct heirs of the legendary tribe, one of the branches of which the author found the Ukrainians. There is no scientific method is writing, of course, did not possess, and was a propaganda response to the partition of Poland. The idea that the author tried to prove was fairly straightforward: since the Ukrainians do not have any relation to Russian nor culturally or historically, no historical right to the lands west of the Dnieper Russia has not. Advocating this was, of course, is designed for the western reader, having a weak understanding of the Eastern European ethnography.

Creatively reinterpreted the concept of Ukrainian another Polish leader-writer, historian, bibliophile Tadeusz (Thaddeus) Chatsky. In 1801 he wrote a pseudo-scientific work "On the name" Ukraine "and the origin of the Cossacks," which displays the Ukrainians from their fictional hordes ukrov allegedly resettled in VII. because of the Volga. The activities of these Polish "Enlightenment" was not wearing a scientific and well-organized political. The fact that the Russian throne from 1801 sat Alexander I, who Gorbachev kind of XIX century., Who led the slavish pro-Western policies. Worst of all, that the emperor was suffering polonofiliey and came in it to such an extreme that even appointed Minister of Foreign Affairs ardent Russophobe Adam Czartoryski, who in the future, during the Polish uprising of 1830-1831., The government headed by the rebels.

Under Alexander the courtyard and public institutions were literally caked with the Polish gentry, which suddenly smitten with love for his Russian winners. But ostentatious conformism hidden desire for revenge Russia at the first opportunity. This phenomenon has even got its name-vallenrodizm. In 1828, Adam Mickiewicz wrote his famous poem "Konrad Wallenrod" with a rather ambiguous story. The protagonist of the work Lithuanian Walter Alf after the Crusaders killed his parents, falls into the knight's castle, where he was brought up a Christian. But in captivity in the castle old vaydelot (Lithuanian folk singer similar to the Scandinavian skald) gives him the love of the homeland and enslaved by hatred of the crusaders. In the first battle moves to the side of Alf Lithuanians settled the Lithuanian prince Keistut and marries his daughter Aldona. However, seeing no way to repel the onslaught of the enemy, he leaves his family and enters the ranks of the Crusaders, where under the name Conrad Wallenrod make a quick career, eventually becoming a Grand Master of the Order. He went on, having made a series of betrayals resulting in the death of the Order. This doctrine was received by the gentry as a guide to action.

Ian Chatsky Taken When Czartoryski diplomatic missions of the Russian government, in 1806 was elected an honorary member of the Imperial Academy of Sciences. His brother, a prominent Freemason Severin Chatsky-Chamberlain, a member of the State Council, privy councilor. First Little Russia became a Polish ethnographer Adam Czarnocki, once deserted from the Russian army and joined Napoleon (participated in the invasion of Russia). Back in 1819 in Russia, he was hiding under the name Zorian Dolenga, to ingratiate himself with the emperor. Alexander I ordered to enroll Czarnocki of the Ministry of Education and give him 3,000 rubles. silver a year on the implementation of his "traveling scholars", and the governors and other local authorities were ordered to provide all possible assistance Czarnocki.

Large, almost absolute influence Poles gained in the education system of the Southwestern Region. In the field of public education was marked and protégé Czartoryski, a former trustee of the Vilna educational district (also included the Kyiv, Volyn and Podolsk province), Thaddeus Chatsky-founder of Kremenets Lyceum. He writes in his essay "The Ukrainian movement" Andrey Storozhenko, "in the first quarter of the XIX century there was a special" Ukrainian "school of Polish scientists and poets gave an extremely talented members: K. Svidzinskii, Goschineky S., M. Grobovsky E. Gulikovsky, B.Zaleski, and more. others continued to develop the beginning laid c. J. Potocki and F. Chatsky, and prepared the ideological foundation upon which we create a building of modern Ukrainians. All Ukrainian ideology rooted in Polish soil had grown. "

Kremenetskiy (later Volyn) High School became a real hotbed polonofilskoy intellectuals in 1831 after the defeat of the Polish uprising was closed, later was transferred to Kiev and transformed into University of St. Vladimir. Another strong focus of Polish influence was the Kharkov University, which is not surprising when you consider that it first became a trustee Severin Potocki completely picked up that professorial structure. This explains the fact that the marginal ideas Ukrainians Potocki and Chatsky entrenched over time among the southern Russian intelligentsia. Kharkov University became a real source of Ukrainians in Russia. From its walls fluttered at will among other figures of Ukrainians Peter Gulak-Artyomovsk, one of the pioneers're coming out, literature, historians Dmitry Bogaley and Mykola Kostomarov.

Last most clearly is the portrait of a typical Ukrainian that time. Nikolai Ivanovich's parents were Russian, he was born Russian, but a Ukrainian writer and historian. "Ukrainian language" he had learned as an adult and began scribbling on it poems and plays, however, mediocre. Teachings of his Polish predecessor of the Ukrainian people alone ardent russophobe Kostomarov adapted for home, so to speak, use, putting forward the thesis of the two branches of the East Slavic peoples-Little Russia and Great Russia. At the same time Kostomarov acted the whole direction of the Polish socio-historical thought, deny the Slavic origin of the Russian people, allegedly having Finno-Turkic origin. Since convince someone it was extremely difficult, there was one more mystical concept postulates the existence of the Slavic world of two poles-the carriers of the metaphysical good were the Poles (collective Christ), and Russian, of course, declared the collective incarnation of the devil, and the bearer of bad things, bad and sinful.

Before Kostomarov anyone and would not have to share a single Russian people into separate branches, although the dialectical peculiarities of different dialects also wrote Lomonosov, highlighting three in Russian colloquial dialect-north, Moscow, and Little Russian. At the same time Mikhail pointed out that the differences between the Russian dialects, despite the vastness of the area of ​​settlement of the people, much lower than between German dialects. But despite the very large differences between the Upper Rhine and East Prussian dialect, the Germans today use a single standard language and a single Russian linguistic space in the XX century. It was cut into three parts. Before the concept of a Great Kostomarov considered purely geographical, indicating the indigenous inhabitant of 30 Great Russian provinces.

So, first, through the efforts of Ukrainians historian Kostomarov in the "scientific" usage was introduced artificial separation scheme people in some branches, then the phrase "Little Russian nationality" gradually but purposefully Ukrainians intellectuals replaced the expression "the Ukrainian people." But there is no rooting in the public consciousness, this concept has not been officially propagandized it was only in the Soviet times.

In general, Ukrainians in the Russian Empire intelligentsia existed quite apart from the masses, varyas in its own juice. And what connection could be non-existent Ukrainian people of Russian origin Kostomarov or as Russian founder of the Ukrainian historical "science" Hrushevsky who speak in Ukrainian not really learned, and even wrote in're coming out to-Move is so pathetic that some of his phrases without a half-liter of vodka is quite impossible to understand? Even the founder of the Ukrainian literary language Taras Shevchenko thought in Russian and in Russian as did lifelong intimate diary entries, which did not have to pretend to be a Ukrainian. Ukrainian "George Sand" Marco Vovchok was also nee Maria Vilinskaya Russian and Ukrainians carried away by marrying Ukrainophile Athanasius Markovic.

However, the regional Little Russian literature of the second half of the XIX century. the Ukrainian language has to a very remote, because the Ukrainian language and Ukrainian alphabet did not exist yet, and enthusiasts of the peasant dialects Little Russian alphabet used mostly by experimenting with phonetic spelling system. Austrian Ukrainophiles many of their Russian colleagues can not stand, and attempts to export Polonized Ukrainian language of Galicia met with hostility. The official language of today's Ukraine, many experts suggest calling Novoukrainskaya. Shevchenko it has to be translated, for a half-century very mutated not only Ukrainian grammar and lexical basis of language. We, Russian, it is difficult to realize such a rapid modification of the Ukrainian language, because for us, not only the language of Pushkin, but even it is not Lomonosov seems archaic, but a person familiar with the Church Slavonic, easy read ancient chronicles.

The first is the Russian ukrainizatorami were just Poles. Karevin Alexander in his excellent book "Russia not Russian (both born rschna mova)" describes the beginning of the Ukrainian movement: «XIX century took place in the Ukraine under the sign of a struggle between two cultures-Russian and Polish. Cherished dream of Polish Patriots was the restoration of the independent Commonwealth. New Poland saw them as nothing but "from sea to sea", with inclusion in its structure Right Bank (and, if possible-of the Left Bank), Ukraine and Belarus. But to do so without the assistance of the local population was impossible. And the leaders of the Polish movement called attention to the Ukrainians.

At first they just wanted Polonised. To this end, the manor house began to open special schools for the fortress, where the peasant children brought up in Polish and in the Polish spirit. In Polish literature appeared so-called "Ukrainian school", whose members sang Ukraine, while giving its residents a special branch of the Polish nation. There was even a special term-"third union." According to the ideologists of the Polish movement, after the first, the state of the Lublin union in 1569 (connecting Poland and Lithuania to the inclusion in this Little-Russian lands of the Grand Duchy of Lithuania directly into Poland), and the second church of Brest union in 1596 (tear off part of the population and the Ukraine Belarus from the Orthodox Church and put under the control of this part of Catholicism), "third union" was tied to Poland (naturally, with the simultaneous dissociation from Great Russia), Ukraine (Little Russia) in the field of culture. In that direction the effort and officials, the Poles (them while many served in Ukraine, especially in the Department of the Ministry of Education).

Oddly enough, but this almost blatant subversion authorities did not put obstacles. What is a "psychological war", then simply do not know. And as openly to revolt from time to time the Poles did not call; the king seems to be not abused, and the danger of their activities no one saw. "

But the project "third union" originally was stillborn, since the Polish gentry their Russian serfs were cattle, and recognize the equal of their own, they were not going to. And the peasants heretics and foreign-language masters assume his could not. Therefore, further progress in the concept of Ukrainians went Potocki-Chatsky. Polish intelligentsia held in the South-West region dominant position, began to promote the idea that the Ukrainians-a nation enslaved Russian. For the Russian colonization resistance they called to abandon the Russian culture and develop their own literary language.

But in this case the results were unconvincing. Karevin writes: "Little Russians educated all my heart loved folk customs, songs, dialects, but despite the efforts of Ukrainophiles remained Russian. New ideas seduced unit. "We are only now in Kiev is not more than five hohlomanov stubborn nature of Ukrainians and the (other) all Poles, more than all fussed about distributing booklets Little-Russian,-reported the prominent social activist K. Little Russian Govorsky Galician scientists and public figures Ya Golovatskaya.-They themselves, dressed in the scrolls, wandered from village to village and scatter these little books; true nosy Lyakh sensed in this business for himself pickings when decided on such feats. " What then was called the "Ukrainian national liberation movement" in the initial stage of its development consisted mainly of Poles (V. Antonovich, T. Rila, B. Poznan, Mikhal'chuk K. et al.), Supported by very few Little Russians. "

The main theorist of the doctrine of Ukrainian nationalism also became the Pole Franciszek Duchinski, brought on track in school Uniate Basilian Order in the city of Uman, Kiev province. Teachers (of course, the Poles) inspired young Franciszek that Russia-the Dnieper, and here-Ukraine inhabited by a special branch of the Polish people-Ukrainian. During the Crimean War, he served in the civil positions in the British army in Turkey, all the subsequent years of his life, wandering through Europe, promoting a radical anti-Russian doctrine. Confessing racial approach to history, categorically denies Duchinski Russian (they are representatives turans-handicapped people, opposing the Aryan) the right to be considered the Slavs, arguing that "Muscovites are neither Slavs nor the Christians in the spirit of these Slavs and other Indo-European Christians. They are still nomads and nomads will remain forever. " He seems to be the first in a three-volume "Fundamentals of the history of Poland and other Slavic countries, and Moscow" (1858-1861 gg.) Expressed the opinion that the name "Rus" Muscovites have stolen the Ukrainians, who only have a right to it. Although the technical details of this "kidnapping", he never revealed, all subsequent "svidomye" historians invariably base their concept on this thesis. Well, consider themselves Aryans quite nicely.

Follower Duchinski terrorist Nikolai Mikhnovsky developed the ideas of Ukrainian nationalism to the most radical forms of fascist proclaiming the slogan "Ukraine-Ukrainians. So, driving away with the Ukrainian foreign oppressors! " This appeal was formulated in the "Ten Commandments Ukrainian People's Party" in 1904, when no Ukraine did not exist, but given that Mikhnovsky she saw from the Carpathians to the Caucasus, the scale of the alleged ethnic cleansing operations is impressive. However, in contrast to his godfather, offering the role of the younger brother of Ukrainians Poles Mikhnovsky already devotes lyaham place second in importance after the enemy Ukrainians Muscovites. In the future, Ukrainian nationalism gained so pronounced anti-Polish character that "svidomye" during World War II tried to go to the practical solution of the Polish problem by the physical removal of Poles (the most large-scale action was Volyn Massacre 1943).

Ukrainian national anthem "Ukraine Has Not Yet Perished Shcho" is a kind of rubber stamp with the Polish anthem "Another Polskane sginela" and written on the eve gentry revolt in 1863 a group of Poles headed by Paul Chubinetskim. The propaganda by the author Ukrainian anthem announced Taras Shevchenko. Poles in one of the versions of the anthem Ukrainian brothers declared:

Oh, Bogdan, Zinoviev, drunk our Hetman,
What has sold Ukraine Muscovites nasty?
To return to her honor and glory go to bed heads,
Adv Ukraine loyal sons.
Our Bratchikov Slavs took up arms,
Not good, so we stayed on the sidelines!

Yes, it is not out of the warm feelings to the "Aryan" Polish brothers nurtured Ukrainians. They are hoping that they will support them in the anti-Russian uprising. Simply put, the Poles are very needed cannon fodder.

P.S. Legally, USSR not broken (exist), real faces don't took decision about destroy USSR. Ukraine legally still part of Russia and every things what going on is internal offers of Russia and not of any other country.

Boeing MH17 was shot down by Ukrainen army

The criminal investigation has not directly linked Russia to the downing of the plane, Dutch chief-prosecutor Fred Westerbeke said.
“We have determined that the weapons came from the Russian Federation. Having established this, we do not make statements about the participation of the Russian Federation as a nation or people from the Russian Federation,” the official said as cited by RIA Novosti.

Trailer for Oliver Stone's documentary "Ukraine on Fire"

OLIVER STONE accuses the CIA for UKRAINE'S COUP and the KIEV MASSACRE. He believes the Western Media is NOT reporting the TRUTH about the developments of the Urkaine Crisis and is PRODUCING a NEW DOCUMENTARY on the UKRAINE CRISIS based on the Truth.

"Bella Ciao" Novorossiya _ in 5 Languages+add-ons

The video is dedicated to the fighters of the Novorossia in the сivil war, Ukraine, 2014 Add-ons: 1) Photo album 'The victims of the Civil War': http://vk.com/album248684425_199307852 ; 2) Playlist Bella Ciao http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=... ; 3) Photo Album 'Bella Cia - The Army of the Novorosija - Армия Новороссии 2014' http://vk.com/album248684425_198703106 ; 4) Photo Album 'Bella Ciao - military girls' http://vk.com/album248684425_199323162 ; (5-6 See later); 7) The backing tracks 'Bella Ciao', минусовки: http://www.realmusic.ru/svetlana_ahma...
U.S. unleashed a civil war in Ukraine, to save its economy from default. U.S. seeks to break the link Europe - Russia, and is seeking to subjugate the European gas market to their own interests. The Ukraine for the USA is only a playing card in it's global game. Russian, Italian, Arabic, Chinese, English. Music at the beginning and at the end of the video by Giuseppe Torrisi http://www.free-scores.com/download-s...
Russion vokalists: Tatiana Grig and Elena Sofronova.

Dempsey in Israel, Jordan, to tie last ends before Obama decides finally on US military action in Syria

Chairman of the US Chiefs of Staff, Gen. Martin Dempsey arrived in Israel Monday, Aug. 12 for critical talks with Israel’s Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu, Defense minister Moshe Ya’alon and Chief of Staff Lt. Gen. Benny Gantz, followed by parallel talks in Jordan. debkafile reports he has come to lay the ground ahead of President Barack Obama’s final decision to embark on limited US military intervention in the Syria civil war.
The Obama plan, if it goes forward, would involve Saudi Arabia, Emirates, Israel, Jordan and possibly Turkey. debkafile’s Washington and military sources reveal its 11 high points - most of which were first reported exclusively in DEBKA Weekly 598 on Aug. 1:

1. US, British, French, Saudi and United Arab Emirates will establish a no-fly zone over central and southern Syria, stretching from the Jordanian-Israeli borders up to and including Damascus.

2. The Israeli Air Force will provide these forces with air cover from Syrian air space.

3. A 40-kilometer deep military buffer zone will be drawn from the Jordanian-Israeli borders up to the southern and western outskirts of Damascus. The military units controlling this zone will hold the entire area of the capital within artillery range.

4. The southern Syrian town of Deraa, where the Syrian uprising sprang up, will be declared capital of Liberated Syria.

5. President Obama has determined that there will no American troops in the buffer zone or anywhere else on Syrian soil, only special Syrian rebel forces.
6. Those forces will consist of 3,000 fighters trained in Jordan by US military instructors. They will be headed by Jordanian special forces and operate under US officers based in Jordan.

7. To host them, the US Army has just finished building in the Hashemite Kingdom a huge training camp and logistical system, debkafile’s military sources report. All the weapons and equipment required to train and arm the rebel force are already stacked there.
8. The American operational command center for the Syrian operation is already in place in Amman led by US Brig. Gen. John Wright, who at 57 is a veteran of the wars in Afghanistan, Iraq and Libya.

9. The US air force units for imposing the no-fly zone over Syria are already in position at Middle East locations and ready to go at 36 hours’ notice.

10. A Druze unit trained by US military instructors will be a key component of the special rebel force. It was put up by the million-strong community which populates 120 villages and towns in the Jabal al-Druze area of southern Syria. They are situated in a commanding position overlooking the Syrian-Jordanian-Iraqi border triangle.

11. US forces deployed in the Middle East, especially in Jordan and Israel, will stand ready for possible reprisals against American, Israeli, Jordanian or Turkish targets, if ordered by Syrian President Bashar Assad in retaliation for the no-fly and buffer zones.

http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=67f_1376374051

In Ukraine, Corruption Concerns Linger a Year After a Revolution

By DAVID M. HERSZENHORN

KIEV, Ukraine — The country is on the cliff of bankruptcy. A spate of politically motivated killings and mysterious suicides of former government officials has sown fear in the capital. Infighting has begun to splinter the pro-European majority coalition in Parliament. And a constant threat of war lingers along the Russian border.

A year after the election of Petro O. Poroshenko as president to replace the ousted Viktor F. Yanukovych, and six months after the swearing in of a new legislature, Ukraine remains deeply mired in political and economic chaos.

“Poroshenko, whether you like him or not, he’s not delivering,” said Bruce P. Jackson, the president of the Project on Transitional Democracies, an American nonprofit group. “The Ukrainian government is so weak and fragile that it is too weak to do the necessary things to build a unified and independent state.”

Efforts to forge a political settlement between the government in Kiev and Russian-backed separatists who control much of the eastern regions of Donetsk and Luhansk have hit a deadlock over procedural disputes, despite a cease-fire in February calling for decentralization of power and greater local autonomy as the linchpins of a long-term accord.

The shattered economy keeps sinking, with the G.D.P. plummeting 17.6 percent in the first quarter of 2015. Hoping to avoid default, senior officials have been in protracted negotiations with creditors, but they have failed so far to secure a deal. Officials also now fret openly that more than $40 billion pledged by the International Monetary Fund and allies, including the United States and the European Union, will not be enough to keep the country afloat.

In perhaps the greatest disappointment to the protesters who seized the center of Kiev last year, the new government led by Mr. Poroshenko and Prime Minister Arseniy P. Yatsenyuk has so far failed to deliver on promises to root out endemic corruption. Instead, it has become ensnared in new allegations of misconduct and charges of political score-settling.

The Parliament, in which pro-European parties control a huge majority, voted last month to create a special committee to investigate accusations that Mr. Yatsenyuk, a suave English speaker admired in the West, and his cabinet have presided over the embezzlement of more than $325 million from the state.

The government and its supporters deny any wrongdoing and say it has gone further than any of its predecessors in trying to shake off Ukraine’s post-Soviet legacy of mismanagement and malfeasance. They point out that Parliament has adopted a slew of reform initiatives, notably an overhaul of the notoriously crooked natural gas industry and installing new leadership at the national bank.

The continuing disarray is becoming a source of friction between the Ukrainian government and its European allies, especially Germany and France, whose leaders helped broker the cease-fire and are increasingly frustrated with the slow pace of change.

“We don’t have simply Russian aggression against the victim Ukraine,” Mr. Jackson said. “We have a predictably aggressive Russia against an unpredictable and unreliable Ukraine. Ukraine is now seen as not to be trusted. What the E.U. is saying is: Where is the decentralization? Where is the commitment? Where are the reforms?”



Not surprisingly, public confidence in the government has slumped, as well.

Adding to the tumult, Mr. Poroshenko recently declared a crackdown on the country’s richest and most powerful businessmen, known as oligarchs, in a bid to curtail their influence and to win back popular support. Yet the assault risks making enemies of the country’s biggest employers, who until now have backed the government.

“When you don’t want to do anything and you don’t have anything to report on what you have already done, you need an enemy,” said Dmitry V. Firtash, a former patron of Mr. Yanukovych who is a major target in the so-called de-oligarchization campaign. “It’s very convenient to use rich people as scapegoats.”

For Kiev, there is no greater problem, and no greater test, than the as-yet futile fight against corruption. Even officials on the forefront of the effort say it has so far largely gone nowhere.

David Sakvarelidze, the deputy prosecutor general, who helped carry out sweeping changes to the judicial system in his native Georgia, has been given Ukrainian citizenship and a mandate to overhaul the prosecutor’s office.

“They are still corrupted, and no systemic changes have been made in law enforcement agencies and in courts,” Mr. Sakvarelidze said in an interview in his office in Kiev.

He described a criminal justice system that needs to be rebuilt nearly from scratch. For example, he said, there was no effective system of plea bargaining to allow prosecutors to resolve cases swiftly, and no clear goals that set national priorities in law enforcement.

“We do not have any criminal policy,” he said. “None of the prosecutors have clear guidelines.”

Instead of existing government agencies taking action, Mr. Sakvarelidze said, the Parliament has been overly focused on adopting legislation that creates even more bureaucracy.

One of the major promises to come out of the Maidan revolution was a new anticorruption bureau, which is expected to employ 700 enforcement officers. On April 16, after long delays, Mr. Poroshenko finally selected the bureau’s first director, Artem Sytnyk, a former Kiev city prosecutor.

Because of the delays, the government has been unable to deliver on pledges of swift restitution. Most notably, it has failed to recover any of the billions of dollars believed to have been stolen by the former president, Mr. Yanukovych, his family and closest associates.

Nor have Mr. Yanukovych or any of the senior officials who fled with him been arrested, with many now in Russia. Corruption investigations against other former officials and executives of state-owned companies have largely stalled.

Egor Sobolev, an organizer of last year’s protests who is now a member of Parliament and chairman of its Committee on Corruption Prevention and Counteraction, said his panel was flooded with complaints.

“The biggest problem in the country is we do not have a real system of justice, we do not have judges, most of them are people from Yanukovych’s time, very corrupted,” he said. “The same situation with prosecutors.”

“And another problem, a very big problem,” he added, was that “Mr. Poroshenko as the president is not ready to fire them.”


Mr. Sobolev is not alone in his lack of trust in the new government. Many of the Maidan demonstrators who are now in government posts say they are uncomfortable with Mr. Poroshenko and Mr. Yatsenyuk, who were opponents of Mr. Yanukovych but also longtime veterans of the Ukrainian political system that the demonstrators wanted to dismantle.

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/05/18/world/europe/in-ukraine-corruption-concerns-linger-a-year-after-a-revolution.html?ref=world&_r=3

The genocide in Ukraine 2014-2015

This article by investigative reporter Olga Luzanova provides photographic and video evidence of the impacts of Kiev regime bombings directed against residential areas and schools in Donbass.
Civilians have been deliberately targeted.  
These war crimes have  been ignored by the mainstream media. They been not been acknowledged by  the UN Human Rights Commission. 
The fundamental rights of children have been blatantly violated by the US sponsored Kiev regime in derogation of international law.  

Photos and video footage by Olga Luzanova
We recall that last October, President Petro Poroshenko contrasted the prospects for Ukrainians with those of the people from the Donbass region during a speech in Odessa. In particular, the President promised:

“Our children will go to schools and kindergartens, while theirs will be holed up in basements!”

Thus far, the Ukrainian government has been doing its best to keep its word. Here is one of the children sitting in a basement in accordance with the Ukrainian President’s will.
Photos and video footage by Olga Luzanova
Article edited by @GBabeuf
The Acting Commander of the Perevalsk Command offered me a short tour of a little town which just happened to be in the immediate vicinity of the front-line. The Ukrainian forces had been firing towards the residential district of the town right up until the day when the Militia had mopped up Debaltsevo. We took the road which I knew very well. We drove through the town where I could see the consequences of the shelling all around. We approached the school from its rear and saw there a football pitch with a huge crater in the middle of it. Then we saw another crater from an Uragan missile near the school.


 http://www.globalresearch.ca/crimes-against-humanity-ukraine-president-poroshenko-keeps-his-word-weve-bombed-the-schools-donbass-children-dont-go-to-school/5439926

 Forty three people were reported dead officially by Kiev. According to the witnesses, and even some politicians the real data concealed by Ukrainian government reaches over a hundred people burnt alive and murdered, and two hundred forty-seven people injured on that day. R.I.P.
http://slavyangrad.org/2015/05/05/r-i-p-ukraine-may-2-2014/

<--------------------------------------------------------->

By Melissa Jones —

In February 2015, millions of peaceful people are living in hell in eastern Ukraine while the national government starves, freezes and murders them because it benefits the New World Order. The Kiev government and United Nations investigators have been hiding reports of genocide, claiming that between April 2014 and February 4, 2015 the overall death toll in the bloody civil war in Ukraine stands at 5,358.

A source from German intelligence, however, told the newspaper Frankfurter Allgemeine Sonntagszeitung that “Germany’s special services estimate the probable number of deceased Ukrainian servicemen and civilians at up to 50,000 people. This figure is about 10 times higher than official data. Official figures are clearly too low and not credible.”

To hear the truth, this writer talked to people living within the “anti-terrorist operation,” or ATO Zone.

One person from Donetsk, which is home to more than 1 million, told AMERICAN FREE PRESS:

“Everybody has faced tragedy from this war. Among my friends and acquaintances and their friends and acquaintances, there is nobody unaffected by it. People have lost parents. Somebody lost a house. Somebody was injured and lost a leg or an eye. Neighbors of my friends have been killed in bombings. The whole family—a couple with two children. It is awful. . . . The scariest thing is that nobody is willing to stop it.”

Human rights groups and the media aren’t telling the truth, so most people don’t know about the genocide being documented live on the Internet by people trapped in the ATO Zone.

- See more at: http://americanfreepress.net/?p=22798#sthash.MutjKumW.dpuf

By Melissa Jones —

In February 2015, millions of peaceful people are living in hell in eastern Ukraine while the national government starves, freezes and murders them because it benefits the New World Order. The Kiev government and United Nations investigators have been hiding reports of genocide, claiming that between April 2014 and February 4, 2015 the overall death toll in the bloody civil war in Ukraine stands at 5,358.

A source from German intelligence, however, told the newspaper Frankfurter Allgemeine Sonntagszeitung that “Germany’s special services estimate the probable number of deceased Ukrainian servicemen and civilians at up to 50,000 people. This figure is about 10 times higher than official data. Official figures are clearly too low and not credible.”

To hear the truth, this writer talked to people living within the “anti-terrorist operation,” or ATO Zone.

One person from Donetsk, which is home to more than 1 million, told AMERICAN FREE PRESS:

“Everybody has faced tragedy from this war. Among my friends and acquaintances and their friends and acquaintances, there is nobody unaffected by it. People have lost parents. Somebody lost a house. Somebody was injured and lost a leg or an eye. Neighbors of my friends have been killed in bombings. The whole family—a couple with two children. It is awful. . . . The scariest thing is that nobody is willing to stop it.”

Human rights groups and the media aren’t telling the truth, so most people don’t know about the genocide being documented live on the Internet by people trapped in the ATO Zone.

- See more at: http://americanfreepress.net/?p=22798#sthash.MutjKumW.dpuf

By Melissa Jones —

In February 2015, millions of peaceful people are living in hell in eastern Ukraine while the national government starves, freezes and murders them because it benefits the New World Order. The Kiev government and United Nations investigators have been hiding reports of genocide, claiming that between April 2014 and February 4, 2015 the overall death toll in the bloody civil war in Ukraine stands at 5,358.

A source from German intelligence, however, told the newspaper Frankfurter Allgemeine Sonntagszeitung that “Germany’s special services estimate the probable number of deceased Ukrainian servicemen and civilians at up to 50,000 people. This figure is about 10 times higher than official data. Official figures are clearly too low and not credible.”

To hear the truth, this writer talked to people living within the “anti-terrorist operation,” or ATO Zone.

One person from Donetsk, which is home to more than 1 million, told AMERICAN FREE PRESS:

“Everybody has faced tragedy from this war. Among my friends and acquaintances and their friends and acquaintances, there is nobody unaffected by it. People have lost parents. Somebody lost a house. Somebody was injured and lost a leg or an eye. Neighbors of my friends have been killed in bombings. The whole family—a couple with two children. It is awful. . . . The scariest thing is that nobody is willing to stop it.”

Human rights groups and the media aren’t telling the truth, so most people don’t know about the genocide being documented live on the Internet by people trapped in the ATO Zone.

By Melissa Jones —

In February 2015, millions of peaceful people are living in hell in eastern Ukraine while the national government starves, freezes and murders them because it benefits the New World Order. The Kiev government and United Nations investigators have been hiding reports of genocide, claiming that between April 2014 and February 4, 2015 the overall death toll in the bloody civil war in Ukraine stands at 5,358.

A source from German intelligence, however, told the newspaper Frankfurter Allgemeine Sonntagszeitung that “Germany’s special services estimate the probable number of deceased Ukrainian servicemen and civilians at up to 50,000 people. This figure is about 10 times higher than official data. Official figures are clearly too low and not credible.”

To hear the truth, this writer talked to people living within the “anti-terrorist operation,” or ATO Zone.

One person from Donetsk, which is home to more than 1 million, told AMERICAN FREE PRESS:

“Everybody has faced tragedy from this war. Among my friends and acquaintances and their friends and acquaintances, there is nobody unaffected by it. People have lost parents. Somebody lost a house. Somebody was injured and lost a leg or an eye. Neighbors of my friends have been killed in bombings. The whole family—a couple with two children. It is awful. . . . The scariest thing is that nobody is willing to stop it.”

Human rights groups and the media aren’t telling the truth, so most people don’t know about the genocide being documented live on the Internet by people trapped in the ATO Zone.

- See more at: http://americanfreepress.net/?p=22798#sthash.MutjKumW.dpuf

By Melissa Jones —

In February 2015, millions of peaceful people are living in hell in eastern Ukraine while the national government starves, freezes and murders them because it benefits the New World Order. The Kiev government and United Nations investigators have been hiding reports of genocide, claiming that between April 2014 and February 4, 2015 the overall death toll in the bloody civil war in Ukraine stands at 5,358.

A source from German intelligence, however, told the newspaper Frankfurter Allgemeine Sonntagszeitung that “Germany’s special services estimate the probable number of deceased Ukrainian servicemen and civilians at up to 50,000 people. This figure is about 10 times higher than official data. Official figures are clearly too low and not credible.”

To hear the truth, this writer talked to people living within the “anti-terrorist operation,” or ATO Zone.

One person from Donetsk, which is home to more than 1 million, told AMERICAN FREE PRESS:

“Everybody has faced tragedy from this war. Among my friends and acquaintances and their friends and acquaintances, there is nobody unaffected by it. People have lost parents. Somebody lost a house. Somebody was injured and lost a leg or an eye. Neighbors of my friends have been killed in bombings. The whole family—a couple with two children. It is awful. . . . The scariest thing is that nobody is willing to stop it.”

Human rights groups and the media aren’t telling the truth, so most people don’t know about the genocide being documented live on the Internet by people trapped in the ATO Zone.

- See more at: http://americanfreepress.net/?p=22798#sthash.MutjKumW.dpuf

 To mislead the public, experts and reporters call the catastrophe “a conflict” between the Ukrainian army and “pro-Russian separatists.” Residents assert that the region’s peaceful population is being murdered on purpose, with hundreds killed or injured daily.

A 34-year-old mother wrote on February 3:

“I badly want everyone to know that the Ukrainian government wants to wipe us off the face of the Earth. They are demolishing our homes and killing our children and old folks at bus stops, in buses, in hospitals, in homes. Our children sit at home and in shelters. And they don’t show this on TV. You can only see this on the Internet. And if now America gives Ukraine lethal weapons, we will cease to exist. Ukraine is killing us with America’s help.”

If Washington’s new puppet government in Ukraine doesn’t want to wipe out the Russian Donbass people in eastern Ukraine, then why did they make the controversial decision to starve millions by cutting off access to personal money with which to buy food and essentials?

If the Ukrainian government doesn’t want to murder as many civilians as possible, then why deny entry to charitable organizations, which can bring aid to hundreds of thousands who are at risk of starvation or injuries?

Why would the U.S. send Ukraine $1 billion in weapons when on January 29 Ukraine’s top general said that there are no Russian troops in Ukraine?

A 21-year-old with a baby born in October 2014 told AFP:

“If America sends weapons, we will be exterminated—not rebel ‘separatists’ as they consider us, but peaceful and ordinary residents of the city of Donetsk. What are we guilty of? I want to live, to raise my child and to celebrate every new quiet and peaceful day, not to cry every day and pray for survival.”

Lifesaving donations marked “For Ukraine” can be sent to the Cathedral of St. John the Baptist at 4001 17th St NW, Washington, D.C. 20011.

Melissa Jones is an independent journalist based in Virginia. She is also an activist for sound money policy and alternative health issues.

 http://americanfreepress.net/?p=22798

Moscow Warns US Not to Store Military Hardware Near Russian Border

Washington was planning to store some 1,200 pieces of heavy military equipment in Bulgaria, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, Romania, Estonia and, possibly, in Hungary, according to media reports.

MOSCOW (Sputnik) — Reports pointing out at US plans to store military equipment on NATO's "eastern flank" near the Russian border indicate that Washington is aiming to undermine a key provision of the 1997 Russia-NATO Founding Act, the Russian Foreign Ministry said Monday.
Western media earlier reported that Washington was planning to store some 1,200 pieces of heavy military equipment, including 250 main battle tanks, in Bulgaria, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, Romania, Estonia and, possibly, in Hungary, "to ensure continuous training on rotation basis."

"This information confirms that the United States and its allies are seriously determined to undermine the key provision of the 1997 Russia-NATO Founding Act stipulating that NATO has pledged not to deploy substantial military forces on the territory of the above-mentioned countries on a permanent basis," the ministry said in a statement.

"This move increases the risks of US military strategy on NATO's 'eastern flank' gaining the "life of its own,' in contrast with reality and political interests of the European peoples, and developing a forward momentum that will be difficult to stop," the statement said.

NATO has been increasingly building up close to Russia's borders since Crimea broke away from Ukraine and rejoined Russia last March. The bloc has accused Moscow of illegally annexing the peninsula and providing military support to eastern Ukraine's independence supporters, engaged in fighting against Kiev.
Russia has dismissed the accusations as groundless and voiced concern that NATO's military presence can only further destabilize the region.

http://sputniknews.com/europe/20150615/1023401618.html